TY - JOUR
AU - Cerqueira-Silva, Thiago
AU - Shah, Syed Ahmar
AU - Robertson, Chris
AU - Sanchez, Mauro
AU - Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
AU - de Araújo Oliveira, Vinicius
AU - Paixão, Enny S.
AU - Rudan, Igor
AU - Júnior, Juracy Bertoldo
AU - Penna, Gerson O.
AU - Pearce, Neil
AU - Werneck, Guilherme Loureiro
AU - Barreto, Mauricio L.
AU - Boaventura, Viviane S.
AU - Sheikh, Aziz
AU - Barral-Netto, Manoel
PY - 2023
DA - January
TI - Effectiveness of mRNA boosters after homologous primary series with BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 against symptomatic infection and severe COVID-19 in Brazil and Scotland: a test-negative design case-control study
JO - PLoS Medicine
VL - 20
IS - 1
DO - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004156
AB - Background: Brazil and Scotland have used mRNA boosters in their respective populations since September 2021, with Omicron’s emergence accelerating their booster program. Despite this, both countries have reported substantial recent increases in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases. The duration of the protection conferred by the booster dose against symptomatic Omicron cases and severe outcomes is unclear. Methods and findings: Using a test-negative design, we analyzed national databases to estimate the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of a primary series (with ChAdOx1 or BNT162b2) plus an mRNA vaccine booster (with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273) against symptomatic Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and severe COVID-19 outcomes (hospitalization or death) during the period of Omicron dominance in Brazil and Scotland compared to unvaccinated individuals. Additional analyses included stratification by age group (18 to 49, 50 to 64, ≥65). All individuals aged 18 years or older who reported acute respiratory illness symptoms and tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection between January 1, 2022, and April 23, 2022, in Brazil and Scotland were eligible for the study. At 14 to 29 days after the mRNA booster, the VE against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection of ChAdOx1 plus BNT162b2 booster was 51.6%, (95% confidence interval (CI): [51.0, 52.2], p &lt; 0.001) in Brazil and 67.1% (95% CI [65.5, 68.5], p &lt; 0.001) in Scotland. At ≥4 months, protection against symptomatic infection waned to 4.2% (95% CI [0.7, 7.6], p = 0.02) in Brazil and 37.4% (95% CI [33.8, 40.9], p &lt; 0.001) in Scotland. VE against severe outcomes in Brazil was 93.5% (95% CI [93.0, 94.0], p &lt; 0.001) at 14 to 29 days post-booster, decreasing to 82.3% (95% CI [79.7, 84.7], p &lt; 0.001) and 98.3% (95% CI [87.3, 99.8], p &lt; 0.001) to 77.8% (95% CI [51.4, 89.9], p &lt; 0.001) in Scotland for the same periods. Similar results were obtained with the primary series of BNT162b2 plus homologous booster. Potential limitations of this study were that we assumed that all cases included in the analysis were due to the Omicron variant based on the period of dominance and the limited follow-up time since the booster dose. Conclusions: We observed that mRNA boosters after a primary vaccination course with either mRNA or viral-vector vaccines provided modest, short-lived protection against symptomatic infection with Omicron but substantial and more sustained protection against severe COVID-19 outcomes for at least 3 months.
PB - Public Library of Science
UR - https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/290274/
KW - Coronavirus (COVID-19)
ER