TY - JOUR
AU - Ahmed, Syed A.K. Shifat
AU - Ajisola, Motunrayo
AU - Azeem, Kehkashan
AU - Bakibinga, Pauline
AU - Chen, Yen-Fu
AU - Choudhury, Nazratun Nayeem
AU - Fayehun, Olufunke
AU - Griffiths, Frances
AU - Harris, Bronwyn
AU - Kibe, Peter
AU - Lilford, Richard J.
AU - Omigbodun, Akinyinka
AU - Rizvi, Narjis
AU - Sartori, Jo
AU - Smith, Simon
AU - Watson, Samuel I.
AU - Wilson, Ria
AU - Yeboah, Godwin
AU - Aujla, Navneet
AU - Azam, Syed Iqbal
AU - Diggle, Peter J.
AU - Gill, Paramjit
AU - Iqbal, Romaina
AU - Kabaria, Caroline
AU - Kisia, Lyagamula
AU - Kyobutungi, Catherine
AU - Madan, Jason J.
AU - Mberu, Blessing
AU - Mohamed, Shukri F.
AU - Nazish, Ahsana
AU - Odubanjo, Oladoyin
AU - Osuh, Mary E.
AU - Owoaje, Eme
AU - Oyebode, Oyinlola
AU - Porto de Albuquerque, João
AU - Rahman, Omar
AU - Tabani, Komal
AU - Taiwo, Olalekan John
AU - Tregonning, Grant
AU - Uthman, Olalekan A.
AU - Yusuf, Rita
PY - 2020
DA - August
TI - Impact of the societal response to COVID-19 on access to healthcare for non-COVID-19 health issues in slum communities of Bangladesh, Kenya, Nigeria and Pakistan: results of pre-COVID and COVID-19 lockdown stakeholder engagements
JO - BMJ Global Health
VL - 5
IS - 8
DO - http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003042
AB - Introduction: With COVID-19, there is urgency for policymakers to understand and respond to the health needs of slum communities. Lockdowns for pandemic control have health, social and economic consequences. We consider access to healthcare before and during COVID-19 with those working and living in slum communities. Methods: In seven slums in Bangladesh, Kenya, Nigeria and Pakistan, we explored stakeholder perspectives and experiences of healthcare access for non-COVID-19 conditions in two periods: pre-COVID-19 and during COVID-19 lockdowns. Results: Between March 2018 and May 2020, we engaged with 860 community leaders, residents, health workers and local authority representatives. Perceived common illnesses in all sites included respiratory, gastric, waterborne and mosquitoborne illnesses and hypertension. Pre-COVID, stakeholders described various preventive, diagnostic and treatment services, including well-used antenatal and immunisation programmes and some screening for hypertension, tuberculosis, HIV and vectorborne disease. In all sites, pharmacists and patent medicine vendors were key providers of treatment and advice for minor illnesses. Mental health services and those addressing gender-based violence were perceived to be limited or unavailable. With COVID-19, a reduction in access to healthcare services was reported in all sites, including preventive services. Cost of healthcare increased while household income reduced. Residents had difficulty reaching healthcare facilities. Fear of being diagnosed with COVID-19 discouraged healthcare seeking. Alleviators included provision of healthcare by phone, pharmacists/drug vendors extending credit and residents receiving philanthropic or government support; these were inconsistent and inadequate. Conclusion: Slum residents’ ability to seek healthcare for non-COVID-19 conditions has been reduced during lockdowns. To encourage healthcare seeking, clear communication is needed about what is available and whether infection control is in place. Policymakers need to ensure that costs do not escalate and unfairly disadvantage slum communities. Remote consulting to reduce face-to-face contact and provision of mental health and gender-based violence services should be considered.
PB - BMJ Publishing Group
UR - http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/256177/
KW - Coronavirus (COVID-19)
ER