- Published
- 31 December 2020
- Journal article
Sensitivity of nasal and oropharyngeal swabs in diagnosing COVID-19 in hospitalised patients
- Authors
- Source
- Annals of Public Health Reports
Full text
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the sensitivity of nasal and oropharyngeal swabs in diagnosing COVID-19 in hospitalised patients and comparing patient factors and admission investigations to the swab result. Methods: Multicentre retrospective cohort study of all COVID-19 swab positive patients who were in-patients on 9th April 2020. Electronic case notes were analyzed for baseline characteristics including; age, gender, co-morbidities, admission blood tests and swab results. The results of each consecutive swab for COVID-19 was analysed for each patient. The number of swabs required to achieve a positive test was used to assess the sensitivity of the test. Results: Of the 173 patients identified, 108 (62.4%) were males, mean age was 68.4 ± 14.7 years. Commonest co-morbidity was hypertension (50.9%). 152 (87.9%) patients had their first swab positive. Age over 71 years was positively associated (53.3% vs. 23.8%, p = 0.018) and age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index ≤ 2 was negatively associated (25.0% vs. 52.4%, p = 0.009) with the first swab being positive. Admission blood tests and chest X-ray findings did not influence the swab results. Conclusion: The sensitivity of swab for symptomatic and hospitalised patients was higher than previously thought and admission investigations do not predict the result of swab in COVID-19 positive patients.
Rights
© 2020 Khan KS, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Cite as
Khan, K., McLellan, M., Torpiano, G., Ng, S. & Mahmud, S. 2020, 'Sensitivity of nasal and oropharyngeal swabs in diagnosing COVID-19 in hospitalised patients', Annals of Public Health Reports, 4(1), pp. 136-141. https://doi.org/10.36959/856/509