Abstract

COVID-19 testing programs in the UK often called on people to test to “protect others.” In this article we explore motivations to test and the relationships to “others” involved in an asymptomatic testing program at a Scottish university. We show that participants engaged with testing as a relational technology, through which they navigated multiple overlapping responsibilities to kin, colleagues, flatmates, strangers, and to more diffuse publics. We argue that the success of testing as a technique of governance depends not only on the production of disciplined selves, but also on the program’s capacity to align interpersonal and public scales of responsibility.

Rights

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.

Cite as

Bevan, I., Bauld, L. & Street, A. 2024, 'Who we test for: Aligning relational and public health responsibilities in COVID-19 testing in Scotland', Medical Anthropology: Cross Cultural Studies in Health and Illness, 43(4), pp. 277-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2024.2349514

Downloadable citations

Download HTML citationHTML Download BIB citationBIB Download RIS citationRIS
Last updated: 10 November 2025
Was this page helpful?