- Published
- 01 March 2022
- Journal article
Undergraduates' perceptions on emergency remote learning in ecology in the post‐pandemic era
- Authors
Full text
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has strongly disrupted academic activities, particularly in disciplines with a strong empirical component among other reasons by limiting our mobility. It is thus essential to assess emergency remote teaching plans by surveying learners’ opinions and perceptions during these unusual circumstances. To achieve this aim, we conducted a survey during the spring semester of 2021 in an environmental science program to ascertain learners’ perceptions on online and onsite learning activities in ecology-based modules. We were particularly interested not only in comparing the performance of these two types of activities but also in understanding the role played by learners’ perceptions about nature in shaping this pattern. Environmental science programs are rather heterogeneous from a conceptual point of view and, thus, learners may also be more diverse than in traditional ecology programs, which may affect their interest for ecology-based modules. We assessed connectedness to nature by computing the reduced version of the Nature Relatedness Scale. Here, we found that online activities systematically obtained significantly lower scores than onsite activities regardless of the wording employed, and that altruistic behaviors were prevalent among learners. Interestingly, scores for both onsite and online activities were strongly influenced by learners’ connectedness to nature, as learners with a stronger connection to nature gave higher scores to both types of activities. Our results suggest that an effort to improve the efficacy of remote learning activities should be the focus of research about teaching methodologies in predominantly empirical scientific disciplines.Rights
openAccess
Cite as
Pagani-Núñez, E., Yan, M., Hong, Y., Zeng, Y., Chen, S., Zhao, P. & Zou, Y. 2022, 'Undergraduates' perceptions on emergency remote learning in ecology in the post‐pandemic era'https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8659
Downloadable citations
Download HTML citationHTML Download BIB citationBIB Download RIS citationRISIdentifiers
- Repository URI
- http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/2946863